Enhancing Sociology Students’ Research Instrument Development Skills through Digital Platform-Based Training at Halu Oleo University

Dian Puspita Rizki; Ghery Safitra Fahrun; Nada Kusuma; Muhamat Arif Afandi; Nur Azisyah Mukmin

doi:10.59110/rcsd.924

Authors

Dian Puspita Rizki Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
Ghery Safitra Fahrun Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
Nada Kusuma Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
Muhamat Arif Afandi Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
Nur Azisyah Mukmin Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia

Keywords:

Digital Platform, Online Research Instrument, Research Methodology, Student Training, Sociology Students

Abstract

Students often experience difficulties in developing research instruments, particularly in formulating variables, constructing indicators, designing questionnaire items, and aligning instruments with research problems. This community service program aimed to improve students’ competence in developing research instruments through structured online platform-based training. The program was conducted from November to December 2025 at the Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Halu Oleo University, involving 94 students. The activity was implemented through preliminary needs assessment, preparation of training materials, presentations, demonstrations, guided practice, group discussions, feedback sessions, and evaluation. Students were introduced to the principles of research instrument development, including variable formulation, indicator construction, questionnaire design, validity and reliability concepts, and the use of digital platforms such as Google Forms and Microsoft Forms. The results showed notable improvement in students’ competencies. Students’ basic understanding of research instrument development increased from 38 students (40.4%) before the training to 80 students (85.1%) after the training. Their understanding of fundamental methodological principles improved from 42 students (44.7%) to 75 students (79.8%), while their ability to align research instruments with research problem formulation increased from 33 students (35.1%) to 71 students (75.5%). These findings indicate that online platform-based training contributed positively to strengthening students’ methodological competence and digital literacy in developing research instruments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abejuela, H. J. M., Castillon, H. T., & Sigod, M. J. G. (2022). Constructive alignment of higher education curricula: The case of a Philippine state university. Asia Pacific Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 50. https://doi.org/10.57200/apjsbs.v20i0.288

Alfian, A., Santoso, I., & Saputra, D. S. (2025). Developing and validating a digital literacy assessment tool for Indonesian primary education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 2923–2937. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7741

Blegur, J., Rupidara, A. D. N., & Tlonaen, Z. A. (2025). Pelatihan konstruksi instrumen penelitian menggunakan pendekatan MEASURE. Jurnal Bina Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.55081/jbpkm.v5i2.3873

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Daryanes, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sulisetijono, S. (2025). Development and validation of research skills instruments for pre-service biology teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 12(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.20.12.2

De Oliveira, R. M., Garbin, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2025). Global overview of computational thinking and digital tools for teaching. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.16847

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). A practical guide to instrument development and score validation in the social sciences: The MEASURE approach. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26. https://doi.org/10.7275/svg4-e671

Kavitha Devi, M. K., & Thendral, M. S. (2023). Using Kolb’s experiential learning theory to improve student learning in theory course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i1/23133

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

Pérez-Montesdeoca, H., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Stendardi, D., & Fernández-Sogorb, A. (2026). Design and validation of a questionnaire on teachers’ uses of generative artificial intelligence. Computers and Education Open, 10, Article 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100332

Pergantis, M., Xylogiannis, P., Vryzas, N., Papadopoulos, S., Giannakoulopoulos, A., & Dimoulas, C. (2025). UX evaluation and best practices for social research data-collection tools: The case of iMedius FormBuilder. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter (pp. 165–173). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3749012.3749045

Raden Ismail, R. M. F. H., Rahim, M. B., & Sulaiman, J. (2023). Validity and reliability of research instrument in evaluation of work-based learning (WBL) elements. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.2023.08.02.011

Soulthoni, H. P. N., Rizki, D. P., & Aksari, A. T. (2025). Enhancing academic writing skills and ethical awareness among sociology department students at Halu Oleo University through reference management training. Journal of Community Service and Empowerment, 6(1), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.22219/jcse.v6i1.38762

Syaddiyah, H., & Ardi, Z. (2025). Analysis of Measurement Instruments in Guidance and Counseling: Validity and Reliability. Mazidah: Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.63738/mazidah.v1i2.15

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117