A Juridical Analysis of Environmental Criminal Law Enforcement as an Effort to Enhance Legal Awareness among Communities

Kajian Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat

https://doi.org/10.59110/rcsd.992

Authors

  • Kaswandi Kaswandi Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Baubau, Indonesia
  • La Ode Dedi Abdullah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Baubau, Indonesia
  • Rizki Mustika Suhartono Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Baubau, Indonesia
  • Edy Nurcahyo Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Baubau, Indonesia

Keywords:

Criminal Law Enforcement, Environmental Crime, Hazardous Waste, Legal Responsibility, Legal Awareness

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the enforcement of environmental criminal law and the legal responsibility of perpetrators based on the analysis of an environmental crime case. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory and case approaches. The primary legal sources consist of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, Government Regulation Number 101 of 2014 concerning Management of Hazardous and Toxic Waste, and the Decision of the Sidoarjo District Court Number 673/Pid.Sus/2015/PN SDA. The legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation to examine the fulfillment of criminal elements, judicial considerations, and forms of legal responsibility imposed on the perpetrators. The findings indicate that environmental criminal law enforcement is implemented through criminal proceedings based on violations of hazardous and toxic waste management obligations. The court found that the defendant, as the owner of UD Mulya, was legally responsible for producing hazardous waste without proper management procedures. The study also reveals that effective environmental law enforcement requires not only criminal sanctions but also strengthened responsibility mechanisms and public legal awareness to support sustainable environmental protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustian, S. L., Sugianto, F., & Michael, T. (2021). Criminalizing corporations in environmental crimes. Rechtsidee, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v7i0.697

Aldyan, A., Aldyan, R. A., Putri, K. A., & Alasttal, A. (2026). Criticism of corporate criminal liability for environmental crimes in Indonesia: Evidence from various court decisions. Indonesian Journal of Crime and Criminal Justice, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62264/ijccj.v2i2.242

Aryani, F. D., & Mufty, A. M. (2026). Reformulating corporate criminal liability for environmental damage through restoration-oriented sanctions and compliance mechanisms in Indonesia framework. Kosmik Hukum, 26(2), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i2.29514

Aryaputra, M. I., Juita, S. R., Sukimin, S., Muryati, D. T., Sutanti, R. D., & Nnawulezi, U. (2026). Examining the model of criminal responsibility for corporations perpetrating environmental crimes. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 8(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v8i1.185-203

Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management, 61, 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2

Brisman, A., & South, N. (2019). Green criminology and environmental harm: The challenge of global environmental justice. Theoretical Criminology, 23(3), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618788213

Dewantara, A. M., & Larasati, D. K. (2022). Implementation of progressive law in enforcement of environmental law in Indonesia: The current problems and future challenges. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v1i2.58044

Faure, M. (2019). Environmental criminal liability in Europe and its relation to administrative law. Environmental Law Review, 21(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452919834455

Fitriasari, S., Budimansyah, D., Insani, N. N., & Tresnayadi, S. (2021). The implications of the green constitution movement program in creating law awareness for river border community. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.40146

Gunningham, N. (2019). Environmental law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 31(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqz010

Idrus, M. A. (2026). Reconstructing corporate environmental criminal liability in Indonesia: Harmonizing substantive environmental law and the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 20(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v20i1.5063

Karimuallah, M., & Permana, Y. S. (2024). Enforcement of environmental criminal law against corporations in the perspective of the PPLH Law and the principle of strict liability. Decisio: Law Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.52249/decisio.v2i2.24

Li, J. (2022). Public participation in China: The case for environmental enforcement. Journal of Chinese Governance, 7(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1968192

Lynam, T., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2023). Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change, 82, 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705

Mardiya, N. Q. (2018). Pengaturan pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.483-502

Newig, J., & Rose, M. (2020). Participatory environmental governance and its role in sustainable development. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1870

Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (2020). Environmental crime and enforcement: Challenges in controlling environmental harm. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(8), 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19897098

Sutikno, E., Rizki, M., Sudirwan, & Jera, A. (2026). Corporate environmental crime and the crisis of environmental criminal law enforcement. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/mlr.v10i1.4899

Van Erp, J. (2018). The organization of corporate crime and environmental harm. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9717-2

White, R. (2019). Environmental harm and environmental crimes: Challenges for criminology and criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 23(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618813095

Wibisana, M. A. G. (2016). Kejahatan lingkungan oleh korporasi: Mencari bentuk pertanggungjawaban korporasi dan pemimpin/pengurus korporasi untuk kejahatan lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 46(2), 149–186. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol46.no2.1320

Wijaya, M. A., & Dzaki, A. I. (2023). Corporate criminal liability on environmental law: Indonesia and Australia. Mulawarman Law Review, 8(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i2.1306

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 140.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 101 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 333.

Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo. (2015). Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Nomor 673/Pid.Sus/2015/PN SDA tentang Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-06

How to Cite

Kaswandi, K., Abdullah, L. O. D., Suhartono, R. M., & Nurcahyo, E. (2026). A Juridical Analysis of Environmental Criminal Law Enforcement as an Effort to Enhance Legal Awareness among Communities: Kajian Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Room of Civil Society Development, 5(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.59110/rcsd.992