Fostering Students' Engagement in EFL Speaking through Small Group Discussion: A Classroom Action Research

Authors

  • Moh. Rif'attullah Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Aisyah Noor Auly Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Fathiyah Al Mustaqimah Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Nur Dahniar Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Baubau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.1010

Keywords:

Classroom Action Research, Learning Engagement, Small Group Discussion, Speaking, Students

Abstract

Student engagement plays an important role in supporting students’ participation and learning in EFL classrooms. However, limited opportunities for communicative practice may limit students’ confidence and participation in speaking activities. This classroom action research investigated how the implementation of Small Group Discussion fostered students’ engagement in speaking. The study was conducted with nine eleventh grade students at a private senior high school in Yogyakarta through two classroom action research cycles. Data were collected using an engagement observation checklist, interviews, and field notes and were analyzed descriptively and thematically. The observation checklist focused on two dimensions of engagement, namely Effort and Initiative. The findings showed an increase in both dimensions across the two cycles. Students also demonstrated greater enthusiasm, more active participation, and increased use of English during speaking activities. Interview findings further indicated that students perceived Small Group Discussion as an enjoyable approach that provided more opportunities to practise speaking, express opinions, and work collaboratively. The findings suggest that Small Group Discussion can serve as a practical classroom-based approach to fostering students’ engagement in EFL speaking.

References

Ariyani, A., Wello, B., Basri, M., & Arham, M. (2024). Lecturers’ interpersonal communication skills and their influence on student engagement in EFL speaking classes. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(2), 512. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v11i2.67062

Beymer, P. N., Schell, M. J., Alberts, K. M., Phun, V., Rosenberg, J. M., & Schmidt, J. A. (2025). Students’ situational engagement profiles in formal and informal science learning environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(6), 1522–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.22017

Cassar, A. G., & Jang, E. E. (2010). Investigating the effects of a game-based approach in teaching word recognition and spelling to students with reading disabilities and attention deficits. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404151003796516

Kamaruzzaman. (2025). Improving secondary school students’ speaking skills through forum group discussion: An action research study. Chatra: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 3(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.62238/chatra.v3i2.203

Kassab, S. E., Al-Eraky, M., El-Sayed, W., Hamdy, H., & Schmidt, H. (2023). Measurement of student engagement in health professions education: a review of literature. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04344-8

Kemmis, Stephen., & McTaggart, Robin. (1998). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University.

Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891

Liu, Z., Sun, D., Zhang, L., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2025). The impact of classroom interaction on willingness to communicate: The mediating roles of speaking self-efficacy and foreign language enjoyment. PLOS One, 20(7), e0328226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328226

Magfira, A., Weda, S., & Muhayyang, M. (2024). EFL students’ perceptions to the benefits of online group discussion. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v4i1.189

Malik, E., Rohmatillah, R., & Rahmawati, I. N. (2025). An Analysis of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners’ Problems in Speaking Skills Based on Their Perception at Senior High School. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v6i1.1106

Mawsally, S. A., Fitriati, S. W., & Yuliati, Y. (2026). EFL learners’ perceptions of small group discussion technique for building speaking confidence in non-formal education. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(3), 825–837. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i3.2529

McNaught, C. (2012). SoTL at cultural interfaces: Exploring nuance in learning designs at a Chinese university. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060203

Mills, G. E. . (2017). Action research : a guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

Munawir, A., & Hasbi, N. P. (2021). The effect of using quizizz to efl students’ engagement and learning outcome. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5412

Namaziandost, E., Çakmak, F., Heydarnejad, T., & Rezai, A. (2024). The predictive effects of learner autonomy and academic engagement on willingness to communicate, foreign language learning self-esteem, and L2 grit in an EFL context. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104528

Peng, Y. (2017). Content-based instruction of EFL and its effects on learners’ needs in China. Education Journal, 6(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20170603.12

Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2024). The best and the worst: Tefl experts’ opinions of the most and the least important predictors of situational willingness to communicate. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241256832

Ranjbar, M., Amirian, S. M. R., & Vaghayei, F. (2025). A qualitative analysis of the effect of group oral presentation and peer assessment on EFL learners’ self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 44(5), 3747–3759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07410-0

Sarwari, K. (2024). Examining the role of L2 willingness to communicate in English language achievements: perspectives from Afghan university instructors. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2400428

Telaumbanua, M., Laoli, A., Waruwu, Y., & Harefa, A. T. (2024). Improving the students’ speaking ability by using small group discussions at the eighth grade of SMP swasta idanoi. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 11(2), 258. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v11i2.12712

Wang, Q. (2025). Re-discover student engagement from the perspective of definition and influencing factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428668

Wotring, A., Chen, H., & Fraser, M. (2024). They are talking, but is it productive? Exploring EFL students’ small group talk. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3227

Xu, X., Shi, Z., Bos, N. A., & Wu, H. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2268347

Zhong, J., Ismail, L., & Lin, Y. (2025). Investigating EFL students’ engagement in project-based speaking activities: from a multi-dimensional perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598513

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Rif'attullah, M., Auly, A. N., Mustaqimah, F. A., & Dahniar, N. (2026). Fostering Students’ Engagement in EFL Speaking through Small Group Discussion: A Classroom Action Research. EDUTREND: Journal of Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, 3(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.1010

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.