The The Relationship Between Perceived Hybrid Learning Implementation and Physics Learning Interest Among Vocational High School Students

Authors

  • Khadija STKIP Darud Da'wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Afdalia STKIP Darud Da'wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-8758
  • Hamdana STKIP Darud Da'wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Rosita STKIP Darud Da'wah wal Irsyad Pinrang, Pinrang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-3848

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.1012

Keywords:

Hybrid Learning, Learning Interest, Physics Education, Student Perceptions, Vocational Education

Abstract

Hybrid learning has become increasingly relevant in vocational education, yet limited evidence explains how students’ perceptions of its implementation relate to their interest in learning physics. This study examined the relationship between perceived hybrid learning implementation and physics learning interest among vocational high school students. A quantitative cross-sectional correlational design was employed involving 59 tenth-grade students from three purposively selected classes at UPT SMK Negeri 2 Pinrang, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Data were collected using a 27-item perceived hybrid learning implementation questionnaire, a 16-item physics learning interest questionnaire, and classroom observations as supporting evidence. Questionnaire data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression. Students’ perceived hybrid learning implementation scores ranged from 49 to 97 (M = 70.56, SD = 8.03), while physics learning interest scores ranged from 30 to 56 (M = 43.34, SD = 5.77). Classroom observations indicated relatively consistent hybrid-learning implementation across the three classes, although patterns of student participation varied. Regression analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between perceived hybrid learning implementation and physics learning interest, B = .284, SE = .087, β = .396, t(57) = 3.251, p = .002, accounting for approximately 15.7% of the variance in learning interest. These findings suggest that students who perceive hybrid learning more positively tend to report greater interest in physics. However, given the cross-sectional design, the relationship should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.

References

Adam, M. S., Abd Hamid, J., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2023). Autonomous motivation in blended learning: Effects of teaching presence and basic psychological need satisfaction. Learning and Motivation, 83, 101908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101908

Brakhage, H., Gröschner, A., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Hagenauer, G. (2023). Fostering students’ situational interest in physics: Results from a classroom-based intervention study. Research in Science Education, 53, 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10120-x

De Bruijn-Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(23), e39439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439

Dewanda, G. P., & Dwikoranto. (2022). Pengaruh model inkuiri terbimbing berbasis blended learning materi teori kinetik gas dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar dan minat belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 13(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v13i2.12442

ElSayad, G. (2024). Drivers of undergraduate students’ learning perceptions in the blended learning environment: The mediation role of metacognitive self-regulation. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15737–15760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12466-9

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Jiang, W., Zhan, Y., Sun, D., Sun, J., & Tian, P. (2024). Exploring the effects of SPOC-based blended learning on students’ learning performance at higher vocational education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6949–6966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2294774

Marcellis, M., Frerejean, J., Bredeweg, B., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2024). Motivating students in competency-based education programmes: Designing blended learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 27, 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-024-09500-5

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K–12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626

Radovan, M., & Makovec Radovan, D. (2024). Harmonizing pedagogy and technology: Insights into teaching approaches that foster sustainable motivation and efficiency in blended learning. Sustainability, 16(7), 2704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072704

Resmiaty, T., Chaeruman, U. A., & Kusumawardani, D. (2021). The implementation of blended learning in the new normal era at vocational school of health. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i2.42495

Saputri, R. P., & Fransisca, M. (2026). Development of hybrid learning media integrating Android and web platforms with an adaptive learning approach. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 12(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpk.v12i1.52243

Song, S., & Lai, Y. C. (2025). Blended learning in vocational education: Benefits, challenges, and student engagement. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2548348. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2548348

Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353

Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., & Liu, Y. (2024). Development of a hybrid teaching factory model based on school governance in improving employability skills of vocational students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.65108

Yu, Q., Yu, K., Li, B., & Wang, Q. (2025). Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(3), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984

Yunita, H., Sesunan, F., Maulina, H., & Suana, W. (2021). Pembelajaran blended learning dengan metode praktikum untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika siswa SMK. Physics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2021.3.2.8606

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Khadija, K., Afdalia, A., Hamdana, H., & Rosita, R. (2026). The The Relationship Between Perceived Hybrid Learning Implementation and Physics Learning Interest Among Vocational High School Students. EDUTREND: Journal of Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, 3(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.59110/edutrend.1012

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.